I think flexibility in architecture goes beyond aesthetically functional patterns. The contemporary interior is defined by the mutation capacity of the domestic and in response to such premises, the house is conceived as a holder of multiple overlapping scenarios, which allow the adaptability of use over time to be maximum. An essential house is imagined, in which the service elements are reduced to a minimum in favor of free, open, and flexible spaces. Definitely, the objective is that the house maximizes the opportunities of use so that its inhabitants live as they want and not as the residence imposes.
This website uses cookies to distinguish you from other users of our website. The use of cookies helps us to provide you with a specific service, to facilitate website use and to understand our visitors. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.